1. If John Perez thinks the proper response to Vernon's long history of corruption is disincorporation, why didn't he favor dissolving the LAPD after the Rampart scandal?
2. If California's upcoming cap and trade policies drive away enough businesses and residents to lower carbon emissions to 1990 levels, would we still consider AB 32 a success?
3. Has Jerry Brown thought about what he'll do if he gets his tax extensions to a ballot, and the voters turn them down?
4. Would liberals in San Francisco be happier knowing that the Tenderloin and Central Market districts were hellholes, if it meant that Twitter wasn't buying office space there?
5. Is there any common thread running through the bankruptcy in Vallejo, the corruption scandals in Bell and Montebello, and the inability of San Francisco and San Diego to balance their budgets?
6. If California goes bankrupt, will we blame the politicians and special interests responsible, or blame capitalism?
7. If the massive public subsidies for green technology and renewable energy have disastrous consequences for the state's economy, will we blame the politicians and special interests responsible, or blame capitalism?
8. If California's leaders could take back any of the foolish pension promises they've made in recent years, would they?
9. Question 8, except for business regulations.
10. Is there a system of delivering goods and services out there that doesn't require corrupt bureaucrats or regulations to work effectively, and if so, would Sacramento ever consider giving it a try?
0 comments:
Post a Comment